Compare renting and buying over multiple years using home equity, transaction costs and invested cash-flow differences.
EIKUAA ÑEMBOHOVÁI
Mba'éichapa oñekalkula kóva?
Both scenarios use the same housing budget. The lower-cost scenario invests the monthly difference at month-end. The renter initially invests the down payment plus buying costs. Home sale costs are deducted at each year-end comparison. Returns and growth rates are assumptions, not guarantees. Tax deductions, tax on investment gains and automatic PMI are excluded; include estimated insurance costs in annual ownership costs.
End-of-year net wealth comparisonOwner wealth = net sale proceeds − remaining mortgage + invested savings; renter wealth = invested upfront cash + invested monthly savings
Peteĩ techapyrã ojeporukuaáva
Compare a 400,000 home, 80,000 down payment and 2,200 monthly rent over 10 years. Adjust growth and investment assumptions to test sensitivity.
Resultado oñekalkuláva
Óga precio
Scenario
Resultado oñekalkuláva
320,000
1
$103,474.27
400,000
2
$59,640.04
480,000
3
$15,805.81
Jeimo'ã, ñemyesakã ha jejavy jepivegua
Cálculo jeimo'ã
Both scenarios have the same monthly housing budget and invest any savings at month-end.
The renter invests the avoided down payment and buying costs at the start.
Annual growth and return assumptions are constant; tax benefits, investment taxes and automatic PMI are excluded.
Mba'éichapa oñemyesakã resultado
Each year compares renter investments with owner equity after selling costs plus owner investments.
Positive buying-minus-renting wealth favors buying under the selected assumptions.
The first favorable sampled year is not a guarantee that buying remains ahead.
Jejavy jepivegua oñemboyke va'erã
Comparing mortgage payments alone with rent.
Treating assumed home appreciation or investment returns as guaranteed.
Omitting maintenance, insurance or transaction costs.