Compare renting and buying over multiple years using home equity, transaction costs and invested cash-flow differences.
ལན་ཧ་གོ
འདི་ག་དེ་སྦེ་རྩིས་རྐྱབ་ཨིན་ན?
Both scenarios use the same housing budget. The lower-cost scenario invests the monthly difference at month-end. The renter initially invests the down payment plus buying costs. Home sale costs are deducted at each year-end comparison. Returns and growth rates are assumptions, not guarantees. Tax deductions, tax on investment gains and automatic PMI are excluded; include estimated insurance costs in annual ownership costs.
End-of-year net wealth comparisonOwner wealth = net sale proceeds − remaining mortgage + invested savings; renter wealth = invested upfront cash + invested monthly savings
ལག་ལེན་གྱི་དཔེ་ཅིག
Compare a 400,000 home, 80,000 down payment and 2,200 monthly rent over 10 years. Adjust growth and investment assumptions to test sensitivity.
རྩིས་བཏོན་གྲུབ་འབྲས
ཁྱིམ་གོང་
Scenario
རྩིས་བཏོན་གྲུབ་འབྲས
320,000
1
$103,474.27
400,000
2
$59,640.04
480,000
3
$15,805.81
ཚོད་རྩིས་ གོ་དོན་བཀྲལ་ཐངས་ དང་འཛོལ་བ་སྤྱིར་བཏང་
རྩིས་ཀྱི་ཚོད་རྩིས
Both scenarios have the same monthly housing budget and invest any savings at month-end.
The renter invests the avoided down payment and buying costs at the start.
Annual growth and return assumptions are constant; tax benefits, investment taxes and automatic PMI are excluded.
གྲུབ་འབྲས་གོ་དོན་ག་དེ་སྦེ་བཀྲལ་ནི
Each year compares renter investments with owner equity after selling costs plus owner investments.
Positive buying-minus-renting wealth favors buying under the selected assumptions.
The first favorable sampled year is not a guarantee that buying remains ahead.
སྤང་དགོ་པའི་འཛོལ་བ་སྤྱིར་བཏང་
Comparing mortgage payments alone with rent.
Treating assumed home appreciation or investment returns as guaranteed.
Omitting maintenance, insurance or transaction costs.