Compare renting and buying over multiple years using home equity, transaction costs and invested cash-flow differences.
MALAMALAMA I TE TALI
E fika pefea te mea tenei?
Both scenarios use the same housing budget. The lower-cost scenario invests the monthly difference at month-end. The renter initially invests the down payment plus buying costs. Home sale costs are deducted at each year-end comparison. Returns and growth rates are assumptions, not guarantees. Tax deductions, tax on investment gains and automatic PMI are excluded; include estimated insurance costs in annual ownership costs.
End-of-year net wealth comparisonOwner wealth = net sale proceeds − remaining mortgage + invested savings; renter wealth = invested upfront cash + invested monthly savings
Se fakaakoakoga aoga
Compare a 400,000 home, 80,000 down payment and 2,200 monthly rent over 10 years. Adjust growth and investment assumptions to test sensitivity.
Ikuga ne fika
Togi fale
Scenario
Ikuga ne fika
320,000
1
$103,474.27
400,000
2
$59,640.04
480,000
3
$15,805.81
Manatu fakavae, fakamatala mo mea ‵se masani
Manatu fakavae o te fika
Both scenarios have the same monthly housing budget and invest any savings at month-end.
The renter invests the avoided down payment and buying costs at the start.
Annual growth and return assumptions are constant; tax benefits, investment taxes and automatic PMI are excluded.
Auala ke fakamatala te ikuga
Each year compares renter investments with owner equity after selling costs plus owner investments.
Positive buying-minus-renting wealth favors buying under the selected assumptions.
The first favorable sampled year is not a guarantee that buying remains ahead.
Mea ‵se masani ke ‵kalo kea‵tea
Comparing mortgage payments alone with rent.
Treating assumed home appreciation or investment returns as guaranteed.
Omitting maintenance, insurance or transaction costs.